🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.